<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>OccupyHouston - Topic: u.s. house speaker: inside trader or corporate bribe taker?</title>

<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://occupyhouston.org/wp-content/plugins/sitepress-multilingual-cms/res/css/language-selector.css?v=2.3.4" type="text/css" media="all" />
	<link>http://occupyhouston.org/forum/reference-materials-for-general-education/u-s-house-speaker-inside-trader-or-corporate-bribe-taker/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[dedicated to ending the corporate corruption of democracy]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 4.5.1</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://occupyhouston.org/forum/?reference-materials-for-general-education&#038;u-s-house-speaker-inside-trader-or-corporate-bribe-taker&#038;xfeed=topic" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>Soapstone on u.s. house speaker: inside trader or corporate bribe taker?</title>

<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://occupyhouston.org/wp-content/plugins/sitepress-multilingual-cms/res/css/language-selector.css?v=2.3.4" type="text/css" media="all" />
	<link>http://occupyhouston.org/forum/reference-materials-for-general-education/u-s-house-speaker-inside-trader-or-corporate-bribe-taker/#p2861</link>
	<category>Reference Materials for General Education</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://occupyhouston.org/forum/reference-materials-for-general-education/u-s-house-speaker-inside-trader-or-corporate-bribe-taker/#p2861</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>my colleague DahBltBucket has some more on this too... guyz, can we put a stop to this stuff.... if lawmakers are voting based on what will make them rich, not what is best for the nation, then they aren&#039;t being true to their office.... which means, every action they take under the guise of &#039;elected official power&#039; is actually a fraudulent move....how many fraudulent laws have passed, how many legit laws for the people have been fraudulently shunned by our &#039;representative&#039; lawmakers????</p>
<p> </p>
<div class="post-entry">
<div><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57323527/congress-trading-stock-on-inside-information/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18</a>.....formation/</a></p>
<p>Congress:<br />
Trading stock on inside information?</p>
<p>The following is a script of<br />
"Insiders" which aired on Nov. 13, 2011. Steve Kroft is correspondent, Ira Rosen<br />
and Gabrielle Schonder, producers.</p>
<p>The next national election is now less<br />
than a year away and congressmen and senators are expending much of their time<br />
and their energy raising the millions of dollars in campaign funds they&#039;ll need<br />
just to hold onto a job that pays $174,000 a year.</p>
<p>Few of them are doing<br />
it for the salary and all of them will say they are doing it to serve the<br />
public. But there are other benefits: Power, prestige, and the opportunity to<br />
become a Washington insider with access to information and connections that no<br />
one else has, in an environment of privilege where rules that govern the rest of<br />
the country, don&#039;t always apply to them.</p>
<p>Questioning Pelosi: Steve Kroft<br />
heads to D.C.<br />
When Nancy Pelosi, John Boehner, and other lawmakers wouldn&#039;t<br />
answer Steve Kroft&#039;s questions, he headed to Washington to get some answers<br />
about their stock trades.</p>
<p>Most former congressmen and senators manage to<br />
leave Washington - if they ever leave Washington - with more money in their<br />
pockets than they had when they arrived, and as you are about to see, the<br />
biggest challenge is often avoiding temptation.</p>
<p>Peter Schweizer: This is<br />
a venture opportunity. This is an opportunity to leverage your position in<br />
public service and use that position to enrich yourself, your friends, and your<br />
family.</p>
<p>Peter Schweizer is a fellow at the Hoover Institution, a<br />
conservative think tank at Stanford University. A year ago he began working on a<br />
book about soft corruption in Washington with a team of eight student<br />
researchers, who reviewed financial disclosure records. It became a jumping off<br />
point for our own story, and we have independently verified the material we&#039;ve<br />
used.</p>
<p>Schweizer says he wanted to know why some congressmen and senators<br />
managed to accumulate significant wealth beyond their salaries, and proved<br />
particularly adept at buying and selling stocks.</p>
<p>Schweizer: There are all<br />
sorts of forms of honest grafts that congressmen engage in that allow them to<br />
become very, very wealthy. So it&#039;s not illegal, but I think it&#039;s highly<br />
unethical, I think it&#039;s highly offensive, and wrong.</p>
<p>Steve Kroft: What do<br />
you mean honest graft?</p>
<p>Schweizer: For example insider trading on the<br />
stock market. If you are a member of Congress, those laws are deemed not to<br />
apply.</p>
<p>Kroft: So congressman get a pass on insider<br />
trading?</p>
<p>Schweizer: They do. The fact is, if you sit on a healthcare<br />
committee and you know that Medicare, for example, is-- is considering not<br />
reimbursing for a certain drug that&#039;s market moving information. And if you can<br />
trade stock on-- off of that information and do so legally, that&#039;s a great<br />
profit making opportunity. And that sort of behavior goes on.</p>
<p>Kroft: Why<br />
does Congress get a pass on this?</p>
<p>Schweizer: It&#039;s really the way the<br />
rules have been defined. And the people who make the rules are the political<br />
class in Washington. And they&#039;ve conveniently written them in such a way that<br />
they don&#039;t apply to themselves.</p>
<p>The buying and selling of stock by<br />
corporate insiders who have access to non-public information that could affect<br />
the stock price can be a criminal offense, just ask hedge fund manager Raj<br />
Rajaratnam who recently got 11 years in prison for doing it. But, congressional<br />
lawmakers have no corporate responsibilities and have long been considered<br />
exempt from insider trading laws, even though they have daily access to<br />
non-public information and plenty of opportunities to trade on<br />
it.</p>
<p>Schweizer: We know that during the healthcare debate people were<br />
trading healthcare stocks. We know that during the financial crisis of 2008 they<br />
were getting out of the market before the rest of America really knew what was<br />
going on.</p>
<p>In mid September 2008 with the Dow Jones Industrial average<br />
still above ten thousand, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve<br />
Chairman Ben Bernanke were holding closed door briefings with congressional<br />
leaders, and privately warning them that a global financial meltdown could occur<br />
within a few days. One of those attending was Alabama Representative Spencer<br />
Bachus, then the ranking Republican member on the House Financial Services<br />
Committee and now its chairman.</p>
<p>Schweizer: These meetings were so<br />
sensitive-- that they would actually confiscate cell phones and Blackberries<br />
going into those meetings. What we know is that those meetings were held one day<br />
and literally the next day Congressman Bachus would engage in buying stock<br />
options based on apocalyptic briefings he had the day before from the Fed<br />
chairman and treasury secretary. I mean, talk about a stock tip.</p>
<p>While<br />
Congressman Bachus was publicly trying to keep the economy from cratering, he<br />
was privately betting that it would, buying option funds that would go up in<br />
value if the market went down. He would make a variety of trades and profited at<br />
a time when most Americans were losing their shirts.</p>
<p>Congressman Bachus<br />
declined to talk to us, so we went to his office and ran into his Press<br />
Secretary Tim Johnson.</p>
<p>(this is just page 1 of 5, folks)</p></div>
<div class="clear"> </div>
</div>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Soapstone on u.s. house speaker: inside trader or corporate bribe taker?</title>

<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://occupyhouston.org/wp-content/plugins/sitepress-multilingual-cms/res/css/language-selector.css?v=2.3.4" type="text/css" media="all" />
	<link>http://occupyhouston.org/forum/reference-materials-for-general-education/u-s-house-speaker-inside-trader-or-corporate-bribe-taker/#p2860</link>
	<category>Reference Materials for General Education</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://occupyhouston.org/forum/reference-materials-for-general-education/u-s-house-speaker-inside-trader-or-corporate-bribe-taker/#p2860</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<div><span style="color: darkblue"><strong>!!!<br />
But these articles are failing to spin the facts the way I would....</p>
<p>should nt be: did pelosi trade on speculative insider info?</p>
<p>should be: did visa offer pelosi a lucrative ipo (quick way to make<br />
100k without fussing through contribution process) in hopes that she would<br />
quietly influence that troublesome legislation away?</p>
<p>It seems to me some<br />
evidence that corporate interests are &#039;constructively&#039; bribing members of<br />
congress to influence laws in their favor.... not true representative<br />
government....constructive fraud....</p>
<p>From<br />
Newsmax.....</p>
<p>Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi bought stock in initial<br />
public offerings (IPOs) that earned hefty returns while she had access to<br />
insider information that would have been illegal for an average citizen to trade<br />
with – even though it’s perfectly legal for elected officials, CBS’s "60<br />
Minutes" reported Sunday night.</p>
<p>In a piece relying on data collected from<br />
the conservative Hoover Institution, "60 Minutes" revealed that elected<br />
officials like Pelosi are exempt from insider trading laws – regulations that<br />
carry hefty prison sentences and fines for any other citizen who trades stocks<br />
with private information on companies that can affect their stock<br />
price.</p>
<p>In the case of elected officials – this secret information ranges<br />
from timely details on lucrative federal contracts to legislation that can cause<br />
companies’ stocks to rise and fall dramatically. </p>
<p>How do they get away<br />
with it? Lawmakers have exempted themselves from the laws that govern every<br />
other citizen.</p>
<p>Pelosi, D-Calif., and her husband have participated in at<br />
least eight IPOs while having access to information directly relating to the<br />
companies involved. One of those came in 2008, from Visa, just as a troublesome<br />
piece of legislation that would have hurt credit card companies, began making<br />
its way through the House. </p>
<p>“Undisturbed by a potential conflict of<br />
interest the Pelosis purchased 5,000 shares of Visa at the initial price of $44<br />
dollars. Two days later it was trading at $64. The credit card legislation never<br />
made it to the floor of the House,” Steve Kroft of "60 Minutes"<br />
reported.</p>
<p>Kroft confronted Pelosi at a regular press conference after she<br />
declined an interview.</p>
<p>Kroft: Madam Leader, I wanted to ask you why you<br />
and your husband back in March of 2008 accepted and participated in a very large<br />
IPO deal from Visa at a time there was major legislation affecting the credit<br />
card companies making its way through the —through the House.</p>
<p>Nancy<br />
Pelosi: But — </p>
<p>Kroft: And did you consider that to be a conflict of<br />
interest?</p>
<p>Pelosi: The — y — I — I don&#039;t know what your point is of your<br />
question. Is there some point that you want to make with that?</p>
<p>Kroft:<br />
Well, I — I — I guess what I&#039;m asking is do you think it&#039;s all right for a<br />
speaker to accept a very preferential, favorable stock deal?</p>
<p>Pelosi:<br />
Well, we didn&#039;t.</p>
<p>Kroft: You participated in the IPO. And at the time you<br />
were speaker of the House. You don&#039;t think it was a conflict of interest or had<br />
the appearance--</p>
<p>Pelosi: No, it was not —</p>
<p>Kroft: — of a conflict<br />
of interest?</p>
<p>Pelosi: —it doesn&#039;t — it only has appearance if you decide<br />
that you&#039;re going to have — elaborate on a false premise. But it — it — it&#039;s not<br />
true and that&#039;s that.</p>
<p>Kroft: I don&#039;t understand what part&#039;s not<br />
true.</p>
<p>Pelosi: Yes sir. That — that I would act upon an<br />
investment.</p>
<p>The Hoover Institution’s Peter Schweizer stressed that what<br />
Pelosi did was completely legal.</p>
<p>“There are all sorts of forms of honest<br />
grafts that congressmen engage in that allow them to become very, very wealthy.<br />
So it&#039;s not illegal, but I think it&#039;s highly unethical, I think it&#039;s highly<br />
offensive, and wrong,” he told Kroft.</p>
<p>“… Insider trading on the stock<br />
market. If you are a member of Congress, those laws are deemed not to apply,”<br />
Schweizer added. “The fact is, if you sit on a healthcare committee and you know<br />
that Medicare, for example, is — is considering not reimbursing for a certain<br />
drug that&#039;s market moving information. And if you can trade stock on — off of<br />
that information and do so legally, that&#039;s a great profit making opportunity.<br />
And that sort of behavior goes on.”</p>
<p>Pelosi’s office issued a statement<br />
Sunday saying, “It is very troubling that ‘60 Minutes’ would base their<br />
reporting off of an already-discredited conservative author who has made a<br />
career out of attacking Democrats.”</p>
<p>Schweizer’s books include “Do as I<br />
Say (Not as I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy,” and “Architects of Ruin,”<br />
according to Schweizer’s page on the Hoover Institution<br />
website.</p>
<p>Read more on Newsmax.com: &#039;60 Minutes&#039; Uncovers Pelosi&#039;s<br />
Insider Stock Trades </p>
<p></strong></span></div>
]]></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>